In the New York Times, the article “Children in
U.S. Are Eating Fewer Calories, Study Finds” discusses the recent federal analyses
which show that children in the U.S. “consumed fewer calories in 2010 than they
did a decade before.” From 1999, calorie consumption per day for boys decreased
about 7 percent and for girls, decreased about 4 percent. The author reveals
reasons why this may be true and how this might influence obesity rates. In
recent years, obesity rates for children in the U.S. have been flat. However,
some cities seem to show a decline in obesity rate. Experts say that “The new evidence of a lower calorie intake for children may
also foreshadow a broader national shift.”
The article includes
two different photographs that help enhance the ideas and key points. The
images were placed shrunken down on the left side. The first photo is above the
other. Both have the capacity to be enlarged. The placement and shrunken size
show that the images are not a huge part of the article, but are there as a
supplement to it. The images may have had more of an impact if they were made
larger. They are very small in relation to the text and do not take up a large
amount of space in the article. Having them larger might make them more
effective although both can be enlarged.
The first image
has the caption “balanced meals at the Blue School in Lower Manhattan. A drop
in carbohydrate consumption drove the decline, research showed.” The image
shows a young girl in a cafeteria eating a school lunch. There is a tray placed
in front of her and she is eating a banana. It refers to the chunk of the
article that considers the potential correlation between carbohydrate
consumption and obesity. Also, it presents the idea of children eating more
“balanced meals” which in turn may have fewer carbohydrates than in the past.
The second image
has the caption, “A salad for lunch at the William H. Ziegler Elementary School
in North Philadelphia. The calorie drop surprised researchers.” The image is a
photograph of a young boy mid-bite while eating a salad. This refers to the
general idea of the article that children are consuming fewer calories as a
whole.
Both
pictures contain simple, straightforward captions. Each of the captions has two
sentences. The first part of the caption labels the picture and gives it
context. It offers general background information on the location of the
photograph. The first image was taken at a school in Lower Manhattan while the
second image was taken at an elementary school in North Philadelphia. The
second part of the caption describes how the picture is relevant to the
article. With these two sentences for the caption, the author makes it easy to
understand the photographs and why they are there in relation to the article.
For
the most part, the two images will stir emotion from people who like children.
Those who have their own children or have adoration for children may find the
images to be emotionally appealing. The first image contains a young girl and
her friend during a regular meal at school. It appears that they have similar
meals and are having lunch at this school. The second image is zoomed in on the
single boy eating his salad with chocolate milk. The images are likely to draw
a parental or child-loving audience because of the appeal. These audiences are
more likely to be interested in the article and find the images to be “cute.”
A large portion of the article discusses
fast food, but neither of the images references the idea that the amount of
fast food consumption has a strong relationship with obesity rates. A
photograph of this relationship would have been helpful. Additionally, a chart
or graph with statistics on decline of calorie intake over the years may have
been a more effective image for expressing the purpose of the article. However,
the images work well in the article as a way to see what types of meals
children are eating today that equates to a smaller calorie intake this decade.
Although other images may have been more effective, both images help enhance
the and relate to the main points of the article.


No comments:
Post a Comment